How to Choose a Home Theater for Movies or Music

Selecting audio components is one of the more daunting tasks that any serious home theater enthusiast faces. On the surface, it seems evident that if you just go out and buy the best components you can afford, they’ll sound great with both movies and music. And that’s generally true: A better system will more accurately reproduce the waveforms you feed it, irrespective of whether they come from a movie or music. But it’s often not that simple. While assembling a home theater system that’s equally spectacular with movies and music may be a laudable goal, unless you have unlimited funds, you’ll probably have compromises to make. At that point, you might want to steer the system’s performance strengths one way or the other with the right mix of speakers and electronics. But how do you go about matching these up?

The first step is to figure out where you fall on the music/home theater scale. And, of course, the best time to think about all of this is before you buy a system. Ask yourself a few questions: Do you and your family listen to a lot more music than watch movies, or is it the other way around? When you do listen to music, is it on for background as you go about your business, or do you love to sit down in front of the speakers and immerse yourself? Then there are aesthetic considerations—the gear’s appearance and how it fits in with your décor. How will those factors influence your buying decisions? Be honest with yourself. If you’re an audiophile who no longer has time to listen but your family will be using the system daily for TV and movie viewing, you’ll want to plan your budget accordingly.

Vive la Différence!
Some are quick to say that good sound is good sound, period. So is it really true that music and movies sound all that different from each other? Yes and no. The very best music recordings and soundtracks enjoy similar traits, such as wide dynamics, timbral accuracy, and spatial characteristics that use the available speakers to re-create a sense of three-dimensional realism. Nonetheless, movie and music tracks do differ in how they’re made and how they’re equalized and processed in the studio.

To start, today’s films boast nearly unlimited soft-to-loud dynamic range; dialogue is mixed to the center channel; surround effects may be ambient or point-sourced; and deep-bass demands can be extreme. Just about every feature film released in the last 20 years has had a multichannel soundtrack.

On the other hand, most mainstream music recordings are dynamically compressed, and deep-bass effects can be nonexistent. For home theater, the subwoofer’s prime responsibility is supplying room-shaking low-frequency effects. For music, the sub needs to deliver pitch-accurate, tightly controlled bass that’s perfectly integrated with your speakers. And while an exceedingly small number of new music recordings are available in multichannel sound, stereo still rules in the music world. Getting thoroughly convincing imaging, focus, and soundstage depth out of just two speakers calls for exemplary speaker design.

The wide dynamic range of movie soundtracks is also linked with high volume capability. All of the speaker and electronics manufacturers’ representatives I spoke with while I wrote this article told me their customers tend to play movies louder than music. That ups the power requirements for home theater over music-oriented systems. For home theater, sound plays a supporting role—video quality and onscreen action grab the lion’s share of your attention, so you might miss or be more able to overlook subtle sonic deficiencies. But a music-oriented system’s ability to entertain and engage us succeeds on sound quality alone, so tonal accuracy and sonic integrity—or the lack thereof—are more critical and become more obvious.

I think I’ve made the case just how different the sonic demands of music and movies are, but most Home Theater readers have dual-purpose, home theater/music systems. That’s the reality, so consciously steering the sound balance toward your preferences is the smart move.

Size Matters, a Lot
Before you can select either speakers or electronics to drive your system, take a good look at your room. If it’s big—say on the order of 2,500 cubic feet or larger—and you crave a visceral, feel-the-sound-in-your-bones experience with movies and music, you might seriously consider buying fullsize, full-range speakers, and audio separates with a powerful dedicated amplifier instead of an A/V receiver. Big floorstanders backed by serious power reserves will typically play louder and with lower distortion than small monitors, even those backed by a sub. In my experience, they sound bigger and more dynamically alive than small sub/sat systems, and in a carefully designed full-range speaker, the bass, midbass, and midrange integration is inherently excellent—something that’s rarely duplicated in sub/sat systems. And even if you only want to crank your system just once or twice a year to impress your home theater pals, it’s nice to have the capability. I suppose it’s analogous to buying a Porsche for your daily commute: Although you rarely touch 80 miles per hour, it’s good to know it’ll go 180 when the urge strikes. That capability doesn’t come cheap, though—in cars or in audio.

When I brought up the question of room size with Mark Casavant, vice president of product development for the Klipsch Group (Klipsch, Energy, Mirage, and Jamo speakers), he was adamant about the need for large power reserves and/or very efficient speakers to match a big space. “Once you’re up in the 3,000-cubic-foot range and want to achieve 105-decibel peaks [soundtrack reference level] in the listening position, you need a very capable system,” he said, noting that the demands placed on subs in large rooms can also be extreme. Here, going with two or more subwoofers would make a lot of sense. Casavant thinks surround effects can be pretty subtle, but the impact of multiple subs is something you can literally feel.

If you’re serious about your movies, room size might also affect how many speakers you need to buy for your surround system. A bigger space may need extra surround speakers in the rear to better fill the room, although no one seems to be advocating extra speakers for the latest enhanced surround modes like Dolby Pro Logic IIz or Audyssey DSX. That’s interesting, if only because you’d think speaker manufacturers would be in favor of more speakers. When I asked Casavant if his home theater customers are buying 7.1- or 9.1-channel systems, his response—and that of every other speaker manufacturer I contacted—was the same: 5.1-channel systems represent the bulk of the sales. Not one spokesperson recommended going to seven or more channels for all but the largest rooms.


goodfellas27's picture

Thanks for the great article. It made me see things in a different way. Great info. to know for the next upgrade.

I just finished with my current upgrade. I got a Pioneer Elite SC-37, with Polk Monitor 70 as main, CS2 as center and OWM5 as surround with DSW Micropro 2000 for the sub, for a total of 7.1. It would be great if you could commend on this setup.

KikassAssassin's picture

I've noticed that I do tend to turn up the volume higher with movies than I do with music, and I think it's because music tends to play at a constant volume level, whereas movies are a lot more dynamic, so if you leave the volume level at the same point, the majority of a movie's soundtrack outside of loud action squences would be a lot quieter. With music, I tend to set the volume to around 75-80dB, whereas with movies, I tend to set it so that the peak volume is around 95dB, which seems to put normal talking voices at around 75-ish.

I also agree with your assessment of Klipsch speakers. I recently built a home theater system with Reference RF-62 floor standers, RC-62 center, and RS-42 surrounds, and they sound pretty damn good with music (they're not quite as detailed as my Sennheiser headphones--which is most noticeable in heavily layered music, like symphonic metal--but that's perhaps not really a fair comparison), but holy crapola do they sound good with movies. I seriously don't even want to go see movies at the theater anymore, because frankly, my home theater sounds better.

utopianemo's picture

Great article! You commented on something I just asked Scott Wilkinson last week: Generally, how does the fidelity of the processing stage of an AVR compare to that of a standalone pre/pro? I had been intent on going the separates route, specially with Emotiva, but I won't buy their processor due to some bizarre design choices they made with their bass management system. My only other options in that price range are AVRs, and I'm concerned I'll be giving up too much in the way of sound quality. Any thoughts on the matter?

Stephen Trask's picture

The John Bowers quote "The best loudspeaker isn’t the one that gives the most; it’s the one that loses the least," sums up sound and image reproduction perfectly. It is the foundation of high fidelity. This article does a great job of summing up the ways different components address this issue in different ways and way mere specs and rated power are not nearly as important as fidelity to the original. Clean power, good wiring, low vibrations, are at least as important as well written decoding software in making sure that ones and zeros are accurately translated and expressed as + and - pulses and, ultimately, sound out of a speaker. The article also gets at, in a succinct and user friendly way, the big differences between recording sound for consumption as music and for use in a films soundtrack. Interestingly, music mixing is more susceptible to fidelity loss because of how the dynamic range is compressed and sounds are blended and yet we ask our acoustic guitars to sound like acoustic guitars, our clarinets like clarinets. Movies have soundtracks that are allowed to suddenly shift between all extremes and yet, beyond the sound of people talking who is to say or care whether the sound of someone punching a a rib roast in a foley session sounds accurately like a punch to the face.

My favorite part is that you confirmed that my months of OCD listening and reading and research have resulted in as good a decision as any, to pair the Marantz AV7005 with Goldenear Technology speakers.

aleksandr's picture

this article help me a lot... Thanks
ps: I'm a HT fan

kousttav's picture

Hi There, really appreciate the hard work here.
just a little help, I am an average music / movie consumer but slightly inclined towards quality music, as in i can boast of my capability of identifying between good quality music versus cr*p.
having said that, i am planning to set up a HT system, in my living room ( size 350 sq ft), where the sitting arrangement is like we sit at the centre of the room, and the speakers can be equidistant diagonally ( the typical surround set up)
budget approx $ US 900. ( Rs. 60,000 in India)
In this budget i can afford an HTiB - Onkyo HT S5500, 7.1 system
(in India, prices are 40-50% higher than in Rest of the world)
would you recommend the above product, given my usage?
also, currently i am having an AVR of Harman Kardon AVR 132 with JBL ( 30 watts / CH) 5.1 speaker set up. frankly i am NOT getting that punch in it, will the upgrade to the Onkyo system solve the problem?

thanking you in advance

ramsreddy99's picture

Hi I have got Definitive Tech BP8060 towers , Klipsch rc 52 ii center, Klipsch RS 52 ii surrounds and YAMAHA RX 473 90 w per channel receiver.

Is this speaker combination a good one to have and after reading this article I have found that Center channel can be an issue for the sound stage. On close observation I found that the BP8060 produce more treble than the klipsch center (may be the 7.1 channel split is reducing the treble/high nodes for center channel i dont know). Is that going to disturb the sound center stage? Please note taht Yamaha receiver has automatic audiosetup feature using its device.

Also Do you think I may not bother about the surrounds being klipsch.


Bob Ankosko's picture
Generally speaking, it's best to choose a center speaker that is from the same brand/family, the goal being to have a center speaker that is tonally similar, if not identical, to the front left and right speakers. Having such a match is less important between the front and rear surround speakers. Definitive Technology recommends the CS-8060HD center speaker for use with the towers you own. You might consider trying that model in your setup. You will likely notice a more coherent front soundstage.