Samsung UN65KS9800FXZA LCD Ultra HDTV Review Test Bench

Test Bench

Full-on/Full-off Contrast Ratio: Unmeasurable

The measurements here were made using CalMAN software from SpectraCal, together with the Photo Research PR-650 and Klein K-10A color meters, and the AVLab TPG UHD pattern generator from DVDO. All the results shown here were for 1080p, standard dynamic range, upconverted by the set to 4K (3840 x 2160).

916samtv.percal.jpg

916samtv.postcal.jpg

With a full-field black test pattern on the screen, the Samsung’s full-array backlighting shuts down completely in any setting of the Smart LED local dimming control (even Off). With pause engaged on the Samsung UBD-K9500 Ultra HD Blu-ray player (which puts pause information across the top of the screen—slightly different than the pause bug on the Oppo BDP-105D I normally use for such tests), and with Smart LED on Low, the black level at center screen measured 0.001 ft-L. At a peak white level of 31.05 ft-L, this produced a full-on/full-off contrast ratio of 31,050:1. With Smart LED off and the same pause indications displayed, the black level measured 0.006 ft-L, for a full-on/full-off contrast ratio of 5,175:1.

With a 1080p input and standard dynamic range, the set was calibrated in the Movie Picture Mode. With the set’s Color Tone at Warm2, the highest pre-calibration Delta E was 2.21 at 50% bright- ness (50 IRE). No other level from 20% to 100% exceeded 1.95. After calibration, using the 2-point White Balance controls, the deviations were greatest from 40% to 70%. The maximum grayscale Delta E from 20% to 100% was 1.81 at 70%; the next highest was 1.48 at 60%. While these values were low enough to be visually inconsequential, attempts to improve them further using the 70% 10-point White Balance control made no difference; the control didn’t change anything. Nor did using the 60% and 80% controls to make a change in the 70% level (in the event that the percentage on the 10-point level controls didn’t line up precisely with the actual 70% level).

(Delta E is a figure of merit indicating how closely a display adheres to the HD color standard. Experts generally agree that at levels below 3 to 4, the result is visibly indistinguishable from perfect color tracking. Delta E may be used to characterize either white balance/grayscale, as above, or color, as below.)

916samtv.vidmeas.jpg

In the Auto Color Space setting, the color gamut’s pre-calibration color Delta E was no higher than 3.21 (magenta) and 2.88 (red). After calibration in the Custom setting for Rec. 709, the highest color Delta E was 1.08 for blue.

With the Gamma control on –1, the post-calibration gamma from 20% to 90% was 2.37 at 20% to 2.21 at 90%.—TJN

COMPANY INFO
Samsung
(800) 726-7864
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
javanp's picture

I logged in to ask where the actual review was, only to find out that the other pages after page 1 were now available.

jnemesh's picture

Or formatting and reinstalling the OS?

javanp's picture

I can't tell if that's a joke or not. However, on my home computer, without being logged in to this website, I was able to see the subsequent pages. I don't know if they fixed it or if it was an error on my end; however, I believe I have seen this very issue several times before. At first I thought they were just doing a different review format but with this one it was obvious that there should've been more. Just wanted to give them a heads up that their web pages aren't always downloading like they're supposed to.

javanp's picture

btw

jnemesh's picture

Sorry! :)

jnemesh's picture

Samsung rejected the technology (Rumor has it, they were offered it for free)...because Dolby Vision OVERRIDES your calibration settings, HDR10 does NOT. This decision was made purely on performance grounds...Samsung didn't want to adopt a system that would "take control" of the set and override the calibrated settings.

DV fans need to face facts. It will remain on the market, but much like DTS vs. Dolby Digital, the "winner" is the one that is mandatory on the discs, and that is HDR10.

sthomp001's picture

I was curious what the settings were for SDR before the calibration. Contrast of 52 seems low and backlight of 15 seems high. I was wondering if this was a typo.

trynberg's picture

Hi Tom,

Excellent review as always. Quick question: is there a directly comparable Samsung TV with a flat screen instead of curved.

Thanks

beerninja's picture

Yet another review from S&V without input lag measurements. If the reviewers do not take it seriously (for every single set) then neither will the manufacturers.

X