BenQ Cineprime HT3550 4K DLP Projector Specs

Specs
DIMENSIONS: (WxHxD, Inches): 14.9 x 5 x 10.4
WEIGHT: (Pounds): 9.2
VIDEO INPUTS: HDMI 2.0b (2)
OTHER: USB type-A (2, 5V/2.5A power and media reader), USB-mini (FW update),
RS-232C, 12-volt trigger output
ILLUMINATION METHOD: 245-watt lamp
LAMP LIFE: 4,000 hours (Normal mode) / 10,000 hours (Economic mode)
Price: $1,499

Company Info
BenQ
866-600-2367
benq.com
COMPANY INFO
BenQ
866-600-2367
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
HT-Ginnal's picture

Al,you have finally reviewed a projector that I own. I too experience the pumping of the dynamic iris. This is my first dynamic iris projector and it is very annoying for the picture to flicker. Is this normal for a dynamic iris projector to do? Also can you provide the post calibration menu settings. Thanks.

walt0291's picture

I was wondering if there was a mistake in the contrast ratio calculation. With the indicated ratio of 1370:1, the black would need to measure at 0.02 ft-l instead of 0.002 ft-l. I wouldn't have noticed but I wanted to see how the contrast ratio compares to the Sony VPL-HW45ES (which I own) and its review indicates a slightly worse black level (0.004 ft-l) but a significantly better contrast ratio (5650:1).

The price of the two are reasonably close, so was wondering which would be considered to be the better bang for buck purchase at this point. I guess I'm thinking that the BenQ has 4K resolution and HDR capability but was curious if the HDR's impact is hampered by the low contrast ratio. The 45ES is a pretty old model at this point, but I still thoroughly enjoy it. I've been watching for the replacement model more for curiosity's sake than anything else and haven't seen anything to date indicating that a replacement model is expected soon.

Al Griffin's picture
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect black level measurement listed in the review. The actual black level measurement used to compute contrast ratio was 0.021 ft-L. Figure has been updated in the test bench.
John_Werner's picture

Al, I was wondering why with LED and laser light engines supposedly becoming more evolved and affordable why is a conventional lamp used here? I'm guessing it may be the cost/performance ratio must be more compelling? If so what's keeping the more modern light engines from really taking hold?

X