Al, fair review of the Epson 4010.
The Epson 5040 is still a better choice with better black level and contrast.
By the way, Rob at PC has milked the Epson 4010.
He Reviewed the 4010, then the 4010 vs 5040, and finally 4010 vs Optoma UHD51A.
Rob my man, marketing genius extraordinaire.
You go Al, do your own thing at S&V.
Epson Home Cinema 4010 4K PRO-UHD LCD Projector Review Specs
Specs
Dimensions (WxHxD, Inches): 20.5 x 6.7 x 17.7
Weight (Pounds): 24.7
Video Inputs: HDMI 1.4a (2), VGA
Other: USB (2), LAN, RS-232C, 12-volt trigger output
Illumination Method: 250 watt UHE lamp
Lamp Life: 3,500 hours (High mode) / 5,000 hours (Eco mode)
Price: $1,999
Dimensions (WxHxD, Inches): 20.5 x 6.7 x 17.7
Weight (Pounds): 24.7
Video Inputs: HDMI 1.4a (2), VGA
Other: USB (2), LAN, RS-232C, 12-volt trigger output
Illumination Method: 250 watt UHE lamp
Lamp Life: 3,500 hours (High mode) / 5,000 hours (Eco mode)
Price: $1,999
Company Info
Epson
800-463-7766
epson.com
- Log in or register to post comments


At $2,200 Epson 5040UB is a better choice
Submitted by drny on December 12, 2018 - 4:59pm

Vs True 4k
Submitted by Ben Hobbs on March 25, 2019 - 11:39am
I do wonder how does this projector (and others that are 4k enables) look against a true 4K projector with a 4k source.

Screen Size
Submitted by geickmei on April 7, 2020 - 5:46pm
You shouldn't be reviewing these expensive projectors with an 8 foot screen. That isn't much bigger than a flatscreen, and most of us choose projection to get a theater size image in a large room for an audience. I'm thinking that some of the settings and results would come out a lot different if projected on a 10 ft, 12 ft, or larger screen. Mine is 10 ft for a 16:9 image and 13 ft for widescreen. THAT is the size I need reviewed for image brightness, contrast, sharpness, etc.