He's a Hi-Res Star: Engineer Steve Hoffman on Remastering Four Deep Purple Classics

“I want to hear what the band heard during playback in the studio. And I want to respect the sound that the engineers and producers tried so hard to capture.” It’s a mantra engineer Steve Hoffman follows whenever he remasters classic, iconic albums, and perhaps those words should be etched between the monitors perched above the mixing consoles in every mastering studio across the globe. One recent labor of reissued love is near and dear to Hoffman's audiophile heart – namely, The Audio Fidelity Collection limited-edition box set that houses four classic Deep Purple albums he remastered: In Rock (1970), Fireball (1971), Machine Head (1972), and Who Do We Think We Are (1973). All were previously released individually on 24-karat gold discs by the Audio Fidelity label (and are all now quite hard to find). While Hoffman, 57, has remastered a number of artists for Audio Fidelity over the years (Alice Cooper, The Band, The Beach Boys, and The Zombies, to name but a few), being a lifelong fan of DP made this project an especially personal one. Plus, as he notes quite succinctly, “It's my job to make it all sound good when I’m remastering.” Hard to argue with that brand of DP logic. Here, we discuss proper tonality in a mix, how to stay true to the “real band” sound, and 5.1 DP possibilities.

Mike Mettler: Why do you have special affinity for Deep Purple music from this era? Did you grow up listening to them?

Steve Hoffman: I love Deep Purple, all the way back to when I was a kid. You might say I was one of their first fans in the States, since I’ve been into them since 1968. I remember I was at Malibu Beach with my camp group—just hanging out, swimming, and listening to my little transistor radio. All of a sudden, a wolf howl came out of the radio: “Hush” was being played for the first time on our local radio station. I loved it immediately. I bought the 45, and have followed the band ever since.

Mettler: Tell me about the remastering process for these four albums. Were you given the original masters to work with? What shape were they in when you got them?

Hoffman: I had the British masters, yes. They were in pretty good shape. EMI-manufactured tape from that era has survived nicely, so there were no serious problems, for the most part. I didn’t need to do anything to get them in shape; I just threaded them up on the Scully tape deck and hit the PLAY button.

Mettler: All four of these albums have been remastered and reissued before. Did you have different ideas or goals as to how you wanted them to sound in relation to what's already been in the marketplace?

Hoffman: Well, I’m not a fan of the usual rock & roll style of remastering classic rock, which is too loud, too grainy, and too “removed from the original era” for me. I want to hear what the band heard during playback in the studio. I want to respect the sound the engineers and producers tried so hard to capture. And trust me, back in the day, DP was not an easy band to capture. Recording their style of music was almost unheard of back then. The engineers did not know how to really do it correctly. But I like the sound they came up with. I wanted to preserve that so the fans, including me, could hear the true sound of the master tapes.

Mettler: Are there specific songs you can cite that posed particular challenges for you in the remastering stage?

Hoffman: Believe it or not, DP might have been a wild rock & roll band at the time, but their recordings were no-nonsense correct, level-wise and tone-wise. In other words, the engineers were professionals who truly cared about what they were doing. I found that mastering DP was like a walk in the park compared to other nightmare albums I’ve worked on. My main goal was to keep the tonality of the original mixes intact while improving on them in small but good ways, like making sure the levels of the songs were correct in relationship to each other and not doing any sound tampering, like adding compression or radical tone EQ to any of the songs.

I spent the most time on [enunciates] “Woman From To-ki-yo” [i.e., “Woman From Tokyo,” from Who Do We Think We Are], because the original mix was totally lacking any bass foundation. So I built it up a little at a time until it sounded like a real band playing in a real space with real live sounds. That took some time. In fact, the entire Who Do We Think We Are album needed work like that. It was very thin-sounding, which was surprising after the rich tonality of both Machine Head and Made in Japan [the vaunted DP live album released in 1973].

Mettler: Machine Head was remixed in surround sound and came out on DVD-Audio in 2001 [and then remastered again in 5.1 as part of an import-only box set in 2012]. Are you familiar with that mix? Was there any thought given to doing a surround mix yourself for this one, or any of the other albums here?

Hoffman: I didn’t play the surround mix of Machine Head but once, just quickly to hear what they did. Of course, I’d love to take a shot at it myself, using more of an audiophile approach with more dynamics.

I like surround sound, but I always have trouble imagining what the consumer is listening to a carefully crafted surround mix on. If the consumer doesn’t have his system right or the speakers are maladjusted or whatever, he’s not getting my mix the way I mixed it. That drives me crazy. So much can go wrong at the consumer level with surround playback. That said, I’d love to remix the entire DP catalog in surround. It would be so much fun for me. After all, it's my job to make it all sound good when I’m remastering. If I didn't love the stuff, I'd have a terrible time of it!

An extended version of this interview appears on Mike Mettler’s own site, soundbard.com.

Mirage's picture

Steve is not an engineer. He is a prick and a liar. Nothing more, but certainly much less.

jpaulion's picture

"I had the British masters"

Huh? I was under the impression that many labels do not send out master tapes anymore, and simply send 1) a dub, or 2) a PCM file.

Did they really ship the master tapes overseas for a CD reissue?

Thank you.


jpaulion's picture

I just discovered this on Hoffman's site:
"Their entire archive of early recordings – some 250 master tapes featuring original albums, live tracks, rarities and out-takes – have been stored in an old Sheffield grain store since 1985."


Charlie Zip's picture

I thought this guy was dead. Isn't this that same douchenozzle who got fired from MCA in the '80s for stealing Buddy Holly master tapes and then tried to peddle them off? Why would anyone seriously hire this assclown?

DCC Fanatic's picture

Steven is a DP God now that he has crafted hi-res editions of these masterpieces. Hi-res DP is all you need.

Kudos to Blonstein/Hoffman for DP'n me!!!

J. Paterno's picture

With Hoffman in charge, even my wife loves DP.

highwaystar72's picture

I'm a huge Deep Purple fan and have multiple versions of many of their albums, notably the four Mark 2 versions mentioned here. These very pricey "Hoffman versions" sound dull and lifeless--more like "Shallow Purple." His Alice Cooper "remasters" from a few years back were also way overpriced based on the anemic sound quality. His spellbound followers on that wacky forum of his hang on his every word and fiercely attack anyone, including world-famous producers and engineers like Ken Scott and Bob Ezrin, who post anything not entirely praiseworthy of Hoffman. If I was content to hear cruddy versions of my favorite albums, I'll go find a scratched up record at a garage sale or one of the early 80s CDs sourced from questionable tapes--not pay through the nose because some guy with a forum says he "breathes life" into the CDs. A pile of feces still smells like feces no matter how much someone contends it smells like roses. The EMI anniversary remasters of the Purple albums aren't perfect, but WAY better than these overpriced, VERY overrated versions.