- REVIEWS
Displays Electronics Speakers Sources Other Gear Software - TOP PICKS
- HOW TO
How To Buy How To Use Tech 101 - BLOGS
- NEWS
- FEATURES
- INSTALLS
Custom Installation - SUBSCRIBE
Cambridge 840C vs. Oppo BDP-95
Pender Linwood
Well, the first thing to be aware of is that the 840C can play only CDs, while the BDP-95 can play CDs, SACDs, DVD-Audio discs, and Blu-rays (including 3D), making it much more flexible. On the other hand, the Cambridge upsamples CD audio to 24-bit/384kHz before converting it to analog, while the Oppo does not upsample CD audio. The only way to determine which sounds better on CDs is to conduct a direct side-by-side comparison, which we haven't done.
I find SACDs to sound significantly better than CDs, but I haven't compared SACD playback with upconverted CD playback, so I don't know if that narrows the difference. (I admit to a philosophical bias against upsampling—I'd rather not have a machine introduce data into the signal that wasn't there to begin with.) I do know that the 840C is almost twice as expensive as the BDP-95 ($1800 vs. $999), and given that the Oppo can play all the other disc formats, I would definitely choose the BDP-95, which has garnered glowing reviews from many audiophile publications.
If you have an A/V question, please send it to askhometheater@gmail.com.
Displays Electronics Speakers | ![]() |
Sources Other Gear Software | ![]() |
Top Picks of the Year Top Picks | ![]() |
Custom Install How To Buy How To Use | ![]() |
Tech 101
|
![]() |
Latest News Features Blogs | ![]() |
Resources Subscriptions |
WHERE TECHNOLOGY BECOMES ENTERTAINMENT

AVTech Media Americas Inc., USA
All rights reserved