LG 55LM8600 3D LCD HDTV Page 2

One of the claims LG makes about the 55LM8600 on its Website is that the set “doubles the detail” over standard HDTV. The only basis I can find for this argument is that LG is using “standard HDTV” as a euphemism for 720p, making this claim highly misleading (there is no 720p competition at this price). Misdirection aside, however, the 55LM8600’s 2D resolution is superb, with a picture as naturally crisp as any I’ve yet seen. Mirror Mirror may be a quirky (though oddly entertaining) take on the Snow White fable, but its production design is brilliant. From the bizarre costumes in the queen’s court to the fur on the forest beast, the LG’s picture jumps off the screen and leaves no detail to the imagination.

Surprisingly, the LG’s Super Resolution control produced subtle but often welcome enhancements. I had to look closely at first to see, for example, how this adjustment brought out the fine crinkles in Julia Roberts’ lips and details in the actors’ skin textures. Once you see it, however, it’s unmistakable. But don’t overdo it; I kept the set’s two Sharpness controls on 5 (maximum is 50); at a setting of 10, hints of over-sharpening began to show up as “ringing” around the edges of objects. And standard-definition material benefitted little from this feature, if at all. But for good HD sources, it’s definitely worth trying, even though the set’s resolution is excellent without it.

Mirror Mirror also proved an excellent test for color, apart from the film’s obviously deliberate sepia tint. The LG was equally at home with the bright hues in the palace and the dingy browns in the dwarfs’ hut. Greens were natural, and the overall color saturation was rich but natural.

LCD sets have typically produced poor results when viewed from off center. But LG has long used a type of LCD panel—called IPS for In Plane Switching—that is far superior in this regard. And that superiority is obvious on the 55LM8600. You’ll still see a great picture at almost any practical seating position. Even at extreme horizontal angles, up to at least 45 degrees, the picture quality holds up. The vertical viewing angle in 2D is also wide enough to include any practical viewing position. With this LG, the fight for the money seat is over!

The primary drawback to IPS LCD panels, however, is that they tend to have inferior contrast compared to other LCD technologies. But add LED local dimming, and everything changes. And this set’s edge-lit local dimming was among the very best I’ve yet seen. The LED lighting appears to be arrayed across the top (and perhaps bottom) of the screen and lights the picture in several independent vertical zones. With LED Local Dimming set on High, you can see the LEDs turn off (or nearly so) when the source goes to black, and the black screen uniformity is good. But if you display a small, bright spot on the screen (for example, a Blu-ray player’s pause bug), not only does that spot light up, but the black areas above and below it lighten as well, though to a much lesser degree.

Similar types of halo effects aren’t uncommon in edge-lit LCDs, but the LG was better than most in this regard. And, fortunately, program material rarely has totally discrete points of light that would allow you to detect this; even a street lamp on a dark night scene throws light around it. On real material, therefore, I almost never saw this banding effect. Only bright white titles against a black background and, occasionally, the black bars on 2.35:1 films showed it, and even then it was subtle and never distracting. Overall, the LG’s black level and shadow detail earn a solid B-plus rating.

Longtime readers are likely getting tired of my referencing Harry Potter movies, but the fact remains that the later Potter adventures, in particular, are extremely useful for gauging a set’s black level and shadow detail. This set handled all of my favorite, dark test scenes in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince beautifully: Harry and Dumbledore in a darkened village (chapter 2); Harry in the dark field outside the Weasley house (chapter 3); Harry returning to Hogwarts at night (chapter 7); a nighttime chase ending with the burning of the Weasley house (chapter 17); and more. There was no obvious lightening of low-contrast scenes and no gray fog obscuring dark details.

3D Performance
The screen design needed to implement the passive 3D technology (a layer called the patterned retarder) inserts visible horizontal lines into 3D images. That’s true of the 55LM8600 as well, though they’re less intrusive now than in the first passive sets. The closer you sit, the more visible the lines become. For me, at a reasonable viewing distance, their main effect is to add a slight graininess to the picture (aided perhaps by the reduced vertical resolution of a passive set). After a few minutes into a 3D movie, however, I was able to mentally tune out the lines.

The horizontal viewing angle for 3D is as good as in 2D. Vertically, however, if your eyes are too low, the 3D starts to fade, and if too high (above the top of the set), 3D crosstalk (ghosting) develops. But from any practical seating position, the 3D effect is superb and the 3D crosstalk inconsequential. The 2D-to-3D conversion mode also works reasonably well, though it does produce an odd effect on close-ups of performers’ eyes. They appear to be positioned several inches behind their eyelids!

With my 3D settings, I measured a peak brightness level of 25 foot-lamberts. This is exceptional for a 3D display and compares favorably to the 32 to 33 ft-L I used for 2D. The set can produce even more brightness than this in 2D, if desired, but 25 ft-L is pushing the maximum possible in 3D. Nevertheless, it’s enough to make 3D images pop off the screen in a way they almost never do with the dimmer 3D that most active-glasses 3D sets provide. In the subdued room lighting I always use for movie watching, the LG’s 3D images never looked dim, though if your 2D settings lean toward brighter settings than mine, or you watch 3D in bright daytime lighting, they might.

Combine that brightness with the total lack of 3D crosstalk on the sources I watched (at any practical viewing height); good resolution (not as good as in 2D, but few viewers will likely complain); light, comfortable 3D glasses; and good color, and this may well be my favorite set so far for 3D viewing. Avatar, A Christmas Carol, Tron: Legacy, and Tangled all looked good enough in 3D to almost (but not quite) make me prefer them to their 2D versions. Those who have read my past 3D reviews will know this isn’t faint praise.

Great black levels? Check. Solid color? Check. Superb resolution? Check. Near plasma-quality off-axis performance? Check. Compelling 3D, with glasses so light and comfortable, it’s easy to forget you have them on? Check, check, check.

The LG 55LM8600 actually exceeded the performance of the two 55LM9600 Nano samples we reviewed in our September 2012 issue and costs hundreds of dollars less. For me, its balance of strengths and lack of serious weaknesses places it at or near the top of the list of the best 3D LCD HDTVs we’ve yet tested.

(847) 941-8182

caseycc's picture

I would really appreciate if you would post your calibrated settings as you did with the LM9600. I've been using your 9600 settings on my 8600 and would love to compare the two.


Kevin Newlove's picture

I found some settings for the LM8600 here if you want to take a look. The past few TVs I've had have been from Samsung and the settings they post for them on that site are usually spot on. For my taste in picture quality at least. I'm going to look for my TVs here on hometheater.com to give them the test. Give it a nice comparison to what you have going on to see what you think. Hope this helps. -Kevin

DSharkey's picture

We have owned this TV since August 2012. I bought this on sale from Tigerdirect and saved hundreds of dollars. My previous TV was just a normal 47" LCD with a low 60hz refresh rate. I was tired of seeing all the ghosting of dark images and there were color fluctuations...so I bit the bullet on this set. Simply put, the set is amazing! My friend has a Samsung 55" LED and this is a better image all around. The image quality is pristine and color reproduction is fabulous. Blur is nonexistent. Blacks are sharp and deep. Also, the 120hz-240hz refresh feature on most LCD/LED sets creates a "soap opera" image effect but this doesn't happen with the LG model. Thank goodness because that looks ridiculous. My friend's Samsung LED TV looks like that and drives me crazy. Even over-the-air HD programming looks great.

I have it hooked up to my PS3 and a Panasonic DMP-BDT220 3D Blu-ray DVD Player and the images are phenomenal. The 3D feature is incredibly realistic and makes the movies look even better. We were watching A Christmas Carol the other night and I was blown away and how flawless the image was. It is also nice wearing the passive glasses as they are lighter and don't need to be recharged...and if you need new glasses they are so cheap.

The smart apps are great, but we only use Netflix. I wish it included Amazon Prime streaming, but that works on our PS3 and bluray player. The image quality is just as beautiful using Netflix. We also use the network streaming features and it connects without any issues and streams perfectly. We have watched hours of TV over our home network.

Some downside that I experienced is that the TV broke after about 1 month of use. The left half of the screen began to flicker and was dimmed, which shouldn't be happening with such an expensive TV. Fortunately, LG was quick to send out repair people and the TV was repaired to perfection again. Also, the screen is incredibly glossy and this can cause viewing problems during daylight hours because of glare issues, however, it doesn't really bother me anymore. The remote isn't perfect and can be annoying when dealing with it going inactive or being unresponsive, but it was easy to learn how to use it. The last complaint I have is that the audio was out of sync with this TV. I didn't have an issue with my last TV, but I was able to fix the problem through a setting on my receiver, but it was incredibly frustrating until I found the fix.

*Note: I suggest check for low price at: Dualcorehdtvs.blogspot.com/p/lg-55lm8600.html

Overall, I absolutely love this TV. It has better image quality than any of the Samsung models I have looked and the 3D feature is a giant bonus that really brings movies and games to life. I would rather have purchased the 7600 model, but I got this one for cheaper so I cannot complain about that.

PvB's picture

LM8600 - I want to keep this beauty so bad but without the calibration settings the picture just isn't right. PLEASE PLEASE post them here like you do for other LCD's
Much Thanks

caseycc's picture

Until the author is willing to post the settings (or even respond) I would highly recommend the settings in the review for the LG 9600 on this site. Quite frankly I would have returned this tv if I hadn't run across these settings. I adjust all the "preference" type settings to my own taste ie, back light, contrast, etc, but the color settings are excellent for the 8600.