# GEOFFREY MORRISON BLOG

## You don't need 1080p

Ok, I admit that I stole this week’s blog post from myself, but I’m still getting questions on this, so here it is. I’m also posting older Gearworks and Hook Me Up articles over the coming weeks so we have a better catalog of helpful articles that had been in the mag but hadn’t been posted here.

Viewing Distance vs. Resolution

Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love 720p.

Resolution starts (and ends) with the eye. If you're one of the lucky few with 20/20 vision (corrected or not), your eye can discern one-sixtieth of a degree of arc at 20 feet. Translated to inches, this means that, at 20 feet, your eye can discern objects roughly 0.067 inches wide, as long as there's enough of a contrast difference between the object and the background. This refers only to black-and-white info; your eye doesn't resolve color nearly as well as black-and-white. Also, eyes and contrast are a whole other GearWorks that I'll get to eventually. Lastly, we're going to stick with width for simplicity, although this discussion obviously applies to both width and height. Most people sit about 10 feet from their TVs. At this distance (and everything else being equal), your eye can resolve objects that are 0.033 inches wide.

Talk TV, Smart Guy
The average 42-inch-diagonal, 1,280-by-720 plasma or LCD display has pixels that are roughly 0.029 inches wide. (Of course, each model has different inter-pixel spacing, but, for now, we'll assume they don't.) If the same size display had a resolution of 1,920 by 1,080, the pixels would be 0.019 inches wide. As you can see, in a 42-inch display at a distance of 10 feet, your eye can't discern the resolution available even with 720p. Even more resolution is "wasted" at 1,920 by 1,080.

Now, assuming that you're not going to move your couch but you want a bigger TV, how does this work with a 50-inch set? The pixels in a 1,280-by-720 display are 0.034 inches wide, which is almost exactly what your eye can discern at 10 feet. A 1,920-by-1,080 display has 0.023-inch-wide pixels, smaller than your eye can resolve. A 1,920-by-1,080 display would have to measure more than 70 inches diagonally before you start testing your eyes' limits on the display's resolution (at least at 10 feet). Scan lines are the pixels of the CRT world and, in this case, function similarly. The pixels in some displays are not square, in which case you'll also need to check pixel height.

Hold Up, Math Whiz
That isn't the whole story. High resolution, in and of itself, isn't why the the move was made to HD. Ideally, a screen should fill 30 degrees of your field of view for so-called "optimum viewer enjoyment." This is why kids sit so close to the TV, and movies in the theater were more fun than your old TV. By making the screens wider and letting you sit closer (thanks to the higher resolution), the average TV's field of view went from 11 degrees (in most cases) with NTSC to 33 degrees with an ideal HDTV. Rarely is everything ideal, though. The "3x picture height" rule that's tossed about as the ideal seating distance for HDTV (compared with 7x for NTSC) doesn't take into account that displays and high-definition material aren't perfect (and, until recently, none were really 1,920 by 1,080). Just because you can match or exceed your eye/pixel resolution doesn't mean that the material you're watching has anything close to that level of detail. Video noise, artifacts, and poor-quality low-resolution sources (NTSC cable/satellite feeds) are all too noticeable at close distances.

To split the difference between NTSC and HDTV, I recommend a 5x seating distance as a starting point (even at a loss of field of view). At 5x, your eye can almost exactly resolve 720p, regardless of screen size. Since the original writing, we put this math to the test, with intersting results. You can read that article here.

So, Can I Buy a Cheap TV?
Just because your eye can't resolve the additional resolution doesn't mean that you shouldn't get a higher-resolution set; it just means that you don't necessarily have to. From where most people sit, you don't need 1080p in a 37-42 inch TV. It's arguable that you do in a 50-inch set. The key, then, is moving your seating. If you're sitting more than 5x the picture height away from your TV, then you probably don't need 1080p. If you can move closer, you should get the highest resolution display you can, sit close enough that you can't see the pixels, and enjoy your huge screen.

The Math
(Screen Diagonal x 0.87) / Horizontal Resolution = Pixel Width
(Screen Diagonal x 0.49) / Vertical Resolution = Pixel Height
At a distance of 10 feet, the eye can resolve 1/120 of a degree of arc, which translates to a width of 0.033 inches.

That's neat to know that the ideal viewing angle -- if you aren't resolution-limited--is 30 degrees. Even with my old non-HD 48", I liked to sit within about 3 screen heights. So perhaps that's why (or maybe it's the kid in me). With regard to the limit at which you can tell the diff. between 1080 and 720, I will point out two things: (1) 20/20 is not "perfect" vision; I think it's merely the limit beyond which correction is not indicated. Many individuals (including myself) have vision that is 20/15 or 20/13. (2) I understand the arguments about the resolution limit of the human eye; but just because you're just at the point where you can't resolve two individual spots, does that mean that an entire field of spots (at that separation) will look no different from a uniform (non-spotted) field of equivalent density? I.e., is the two-spot resolution figure the right statistic for evaluating the perceptibility of resolution changes in pictures? I'd need to see some controlled studies before accepting that.

We did a follow up to test the math, with some interesting results. The link is in the article. Shortly after the original article was published, Panasonic released a study of their own with nearly identical results to the math here.

Just read the link. Looks like you're on the right track: you're trying to eliminate as many variables as possible, to isolate the comparison to resolution alone. Here's an alternate approach you might consider: You'll need an HD-DVD player, a 1080p display, and (two of) the best scaler you can find. Then compare Case I and Case II: Case I: output 1080i from the HD-DVD to one of the scalers, then output 1080p from this scaler to the display. Case II: Output 1080i from the HD-DVD to the first scaler; then output 540p from this first scaler to the second scaler; finally output 1080p from the second scaler to the display. Thus in Cases I and II you are feeding the display with 1080 and 540 lines of resolution, respectively. Yes, in Case II the signal is rescaled twice; but by doing "integral" scaling with good scalers, you may be introducing less variation than w/ your approach of using two different display models (w/ the attendant unavoidable differences in circuitry, calibration, and pixel struture).

Well there you have it. An intellegent discussion that shows the limits of our eyesight has been reached. Thanks

I just read the review on the new Sony SXRD A2000 and it wasn't exactly a rave. I don't understand how the Grand Wega RPTV recieved a better overall rating a year and a half ago than this tv even though it has a 720p resolution compared to this tv which has a 1080p. I have looked at both tvs and for an aditional 300-500 dollars the new one blows the grand wega out of the water. In comparison to last years xbr it is a step down but the review has scared me off slightly. I thought this tv would be the one to replace my old Non-HD tv but your objection to lack of detail has left me a bit puzzled. Please help ease my mind.

Very nice explanation. A couple of questions:- Suppose I buy a 720p set now and in 2 years when blue ray DVD players are cheap, I get one of those. Can I feed the 1080p signal from the player to the 720p TV and see a nice clean picture? Will I need a scalar of sorts? Or will the DVD player output a 720p signal?- Which 720p TVs now are capable of processing a 1080p signal correctly for viewing - if any?Thanks very much

To John: Well, perhaps the limit of our eyesight with respect to spatial resolution - unless, like me, you like to sit quite close to the screen. But don't forget about gray-scale and color resolution. In these areas, I don't believe displays can meet the abilities of the human eye. Also, at 24 fps, we haven't reached the limit of our eyes' temporal resolution. Not to mention the noise that is often present from displays and sources. And I think you understand this all intuitively. After all, if TV displays and sources were perfect, with one eye closed (thus removing our binocular vision), we wouldn't be able to distinguish between what's on a display and what we see looking through a window. Yet of course even the best displayed video doesn't yet come close to real life. So there's still a long way to go before we get to the point where improvements in performance can no longer effect a noticeable difference in picture quality.

Refreshing to read someone who understands visual acuity. From experience, color, contrast, and resolution, in that order, will determine perception of quality. Note that resolution is last. That should offer further explaination to those folks who are confused about how a 720 display can look better than a 1080 display.

It's worth remembering that resolution is different in the vertical and horizontal directions. In principle, assuming a monochrome CRT, the horizontal direction is continuously varying in brightness whereas the vertical direction is sampled by the line structure. This means that the max spacial frequency vertically is limited at best to half that of the line structure. Therefore, the resolution horizontally is better than vertically. I realise the pixel structure of modern display devices upsets horizontal as well as vertical definition, because it imposes sampling on both, but it is worth remembering the basic limitations of a line-scanned system.

Note; the static image resolution test that found that the Sony A2000 displayed less than the full potential of a 1080p source has been resolved by Sony since some time during the August 2006 build. A free fix from Sony on a memory stick that can be inserted in the rear USB input is available for sets built prior to the fix. Sony claims that it not a real issue in that it is only a limit in displaying the static test image and is not a limit on real program material (which is 1080i/60 in any case. That is what Sony say's. There is a simple recalibration one can perform in the service menue to fix this without the USB memory card from Sony. People on the calibration/user blogs don't report that they see a resolution issue on these early sets before or after the "fix."RichardRichard.

12

erterstesrtesr

o

G

j

teşekkürler

teşekkürler

<リンク:http://www.i-never.net/a001>高収入で上位表示の当サイトでお仕事GET！

Interesting post ToM. You said, “it uses and alters the shot material of Brando without his consent or creative consultation.” That might be somewhat difficult due to Brando’s being dead.http://www.plastikcerrahi.net

The Penis Enlargement program is the most powerful natural male enhancement program available anywhere in the world. With years of success behind our product and being one of the only companies that uses 100% natural ingredients we foresee you having great success.http://www.teomandogan.com

To John: Well, perhaps the limit of our eyesight with respect to spatial resolution - unless, like me, you like to sit quite close to the screen. But don't forget about gray-scale and color resolution. In these areas, I don't believe displays can meet the abilities of the human eye. Also, at 24 fps, we haven't reached the limit of our eyes' temporal resolution. Not to mention the noise that is often present from displays and sources. And I think you understand this all intuitively. After all, if TV displays and sources were perfect, with one eye closed (thus removing our binocular vision), we wouldn't be able to distinguish between what's on a display and what we see looking through a window. Yet of course even the best displayed video doesn't yet come close to real life. So there's still a long way to go before we get to the point where improvements in

thank you

the best blog

it is see i really do not need the 1080p,, thank you for your advise.

thank you for you post , i will booke your article,[URL=http://www.handbagdrop.com/miu-miu-handbag.html]miu miu handbags[/URL][URL=http://www.handbagdrop.com/juicy-handbag.html]juicy handbags[/URL]

sicak sicak videolar burada izle porno eğlence sohbet chat

everything is good,will be better on tomorrow. wholesale replica handbag,shoes,wallet,jewelry, louis vuitton replica handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=90 coach purses; www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=91 chanel handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=93 gucci handbag, www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=94 juicy handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=99 db handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=100 ed hardy handbags: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=102 Apparel/Pants/Jeans www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=97 Footwear/Boots/Sandals www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=260 Accessories/Electronics www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=98 alex

thank you

Sohbet,Seviyeli,Kaliteli,Ege Marmara

thanks http://www.cloci.com coach handbag http://www.cloci.com coach wholesale http://www.cloci.com wholesale purses

So there's still a long way to overcome before we get to the point where improvements in .i'm a student ,but i take a part-time job,welcome to my website www.edhardyhandbag.com.where there are many newst brand handbags .just have a look ,and you will get what you want .haha .thanks for your attention .http://edhardyhandbag.com/index.html

thank you

Do you know what the fashion is in this summer? Right now! Popular Fashion Storm is coming to you. Take your time to go to http://www.edhardyhandbag.com , you will find what you’ve dreamed. All fashion will show to you. http://www.edhardyhandbag.com will make you feel the new “space”, you can take time to indulge. Please feel free to contact me by email on my website .http://www.edhardyhandbag.com/products.asp?classid=101http://www.edhardy...

www.ben10-oyunlari.com" target="_blank" title="ben 10 oyunları">en güzel ben10 oyunları

Would you like to know what it is now popular in this summer? Would you like to know where fashion is? Come on, friends, let me lead you walk in the forefront of fashion, all tides of the trend are in your control. Welcome to visit our website http://www.handbag789.com http://www.handbag789.com/index.asp http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=230 http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=75http://www.handbag789.c... http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=106http://www.handbag789....

The max spacial frequency vertically is limited at best to half that of the line structure. Therefore, the resolution horizontally is better than vertically..maç oyunları

To split the difference between NTSC and HDTV, I recommend a 5x seating distance as a starting point (even at a loss of field of view). At 5x, your eye can almost exactly resolve 720p, regardless of screen size. Since the original writing, we put this math to the test, with intersting results. You can read that article http://www.oyunforumu.net

As a Newbie, I am always searching online for information that can help me. Thank you. Please come visit my site Florida FL Phone Directory when you got time.

This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Thursday. Please come visit my site San Francisco Business Services And Classifieds when you got time.

i actually adore your own posting kind, very helpful,don't give up as well as keep posting considering the fact that it simply that is worth to read it.excited to see a whole lot more of your own article content, have a good one :)

yo... interesting thoughts :)my wife amateur anal sex - amatuer movies ratingnude bbw artistic photography - bbw having sex on livetickling forced: forced lezbianfree pissing girl video: chicks busting to peepussy milk squirting peeing spyunder 18 forced sex law enforcers and celebrities

fkvFDQ Hello! and clarina and http://clarina-fda.viviti.com clarina and ryv and cheap lariam and http://lariam-fda.viviti.com cheap lariam and 019 and

Hi! and dentist grass valley california and attire beach flower girl wedding and american stroke association conference and car cost insurance less u and subaru impreza car insurance and ldeq conference and lisa see snow flower and

Howdy, and ham lake minnesota conference call services and penn security bank trust company and casino internet play and best casino game line online and adult asp hosting web and flower guide perennial and

Aloha! and sustainable conference and kenzo flower fragrance and car insurance specialist and bird fifty flower print state and payday loan with no checking or direct deposit and

Howdy, and linux windows security comparison and interagency sedimentation conference and implant dentistry district of columbia and voip reading pa and laser dentistry los angeles and network security management components and

How are you? and homeland security studies and fica credit report and fair accurate credit reporting act and conferencing internet solutions and india php web hosting and

Howdy, and dogwood flower meaning and banana flower vadai and dentist cosmetics and web builder reseller hosting and insurance life load no quote and

Hi! and best way to get out of debt and the watering can flower shop and canadian flower girl dresses and cosmetic dallas dentistry and wilmette flower shops and cold spring dentist and north carolina worker compensation insurance and

Hello! and conference baptist church evergreen and low income dentist and burnaby flower gift love romance and camera home security toronto and methamphetamine conference and flower delivery service montreal and dedicated windows server hosting and

How are you? and flower heartsease and mississippi hosting cheap web package and average medical student debt and candy flower bouquets and statute of limitation debt collection and payday loans no teletrax and

Howdy, and tips on how to collect bad debt and consumer goods conferences and flower picture violet and in insurance life rate term us and upcoming conferences india and algernon essay flower and

Hello! and types of auto insurance coverage and card collector credit debt debt purchase and credit score what and by card credit score and georgia o keeffe flower paintings and bouquet flower silk snapdragons sunflower and payday loan debt management and

Hello! and gold visa card travel insurance and picture of tulip flower and flower springfield il and big ten conference football and conferencing guide web and collection dress flower from girl sweetie and

Hi! and umbrella flower pictures and best hosting solution and flower gift and wedding and bulb flower plant plant when and beneficiary designation insurance life and

Hi! and silver flower earrings and guy wolff flower pots and life insurance proceeds fafsa and home security stores in az and craft fairy flower and car insurance cumberland maryland and

Hello! and easter flower send and christian counseling debt nonprofit and life insurance policy types and butterfly flower little and unique flower gift and

How are you? and flower plastic pot size and what is a excellent credit score and content based information security cbis and international cargo insurance and lotus flower in buddhism and hispanic mba conference and

Howdy, and conference icsc and payday money store and artificial flower thistle and voip integration and canada trust auto insurance and hosting games in warcraft 3 and

Hi! and bad consolidation credit debt mortg and college conference mac result wrestling and viktor and rolf flower bomb and long term debt to capital and medical conference june and explantion of credit rating scores and apsa conference proceedings and

Aloha! and hispanic tv advertising for dentists and wholesale silk flower in florida and aaterm insurance life online quote and dentist ga marietta and nine elms flower market and hosting online provider web and

Aloha! and winter conference miami and quote insurance car and company insurance life owned and conference banqueting in hackney and bardstown web hosting and

Hi! and america annual bank conference investment and credit reporting agancies and oracle database security audit and consumer debt elimination law specialist and cbi msl conference and nmeda conference and

I love this site child molester porn rdyacw clips fuckingbikini gtq nicole kidman porno >:PP illegal child rape vidoes ixdf young teen real pics 881810 little pussy photo uehtg sex bikini-stories %]] young teen bend over 7069 pics women competition swimsuit micro bikini 19683 sexu young teens %OOO max kiki bbs sports touzokudan 349 adult costume halloween young vvsaxm bikini dare orange 8-DDD older woman younger men porn saha ass thong tiny %-(( fucked cute teen 019782 cute teenage love quotes 605224 young asian girls galerie vfsd free young teen girls masterbating solo =-( bbs blog wenxuecity com 34037

aimew.jp/doutei_man/

Here is the newest coupon code for a free sample of replica mac cosmetics Zoom Lash mascara with any purchase. You will also get free shipping on your order. Just enter promotional code LASH510 at checkout at http://www.maccosmeticsreplica.com. Keep in mind that these offers expire after a period of time.

6hp.jp/?id=doutei

(*ﾟ∀ﾟ)セク大好きってやつも歓迎な＼(*^▽^*)ノ一緒にハメハメしちゃおうぜ！！douteidoutei.mh7.mp7.jp/

Very funny pictures

Gloomy tales

Very interesting tale

Very interesting tale

Thanks funny site

Very funny pictures

real beauty page

It's funny goodluck

Wonderfull great site

Very Good Site

X