LATEST ADDITIONS

Parke Puterbaugh  |  Sep 03, 2007

Rad Bennett  |  Sep 03, 2007

Ken Korman  |  Sep 03, 2007

Andrew Nash  |  Sep 03, 2007

Parke Puterbaugh  |  Sep 03, 2007

Rob O'Connor  |  Sep 03, 2007

Jeff Perlah  |  Sep 03, 2007
Can I Keep This Pen? Ipecac
Music •••• Sound ••••
My homies (from the same high school on Long Island) have bolted from Columbia and are n
James K. Willcox  |  Sep 03, 2007

Clearly embedded somewhere in America's national psyche is an obsession with getting thin. How else do you explain both the celebrity of Nicole Richie and the craze for flat-panel TVs? In fact, with the increased focus on TVs slim enough to be mounted on a wall, the environment for rear-projection HDTVs has gotten a lot tougher.

Doug Christianson  |  Sep 03, 2007

<I>An electrical background and a passion for gear garnered this reader a great DIY theater. </I>

Adrienne Maxwell  |  Sep 03, 2007  |  First Published: Aug 03, 2007
At 42 inches, how much resolution do you need?

Do you need 1080p in a 42-inch flat panel? This is an important question, especially for plasma manufacturers that fear losing customers to the LCD camp at this highly coveted screen size. Up until now, plasma technology's cell structure has made it difficult to fit 1,920 by 1,080 pixels into a 42-inch screen size, which seems to have put them at a competitive disadvantage. As I write this, the first true 1080p 42-inch plasma (a Panasonic) is about to hit the shelves at a price of $2,500, but the market is already littered with 42-inch 1080p LCDs priced under $2,000. If consumers believe that they must have 1080p right now, it's fairly obvious which route they'll go.

Pages

X