Panasonic TC-P55VT30 3D Plasma HDTV HT Labs Measures

HT Labs Measures

Full-On/Full-Off Contrast Ratio: 4,187:1

All of the measurements here, unless noted otherwise, were taken in the Cinema or THX Picture mode, in 2D, through an HDMI input, and with the set adjusted as needed for the most accurate image in a darkened room.

Delta E, a number referenced in the following discussions, is a figure of merit that indicates how close a display’s color tracking comes to producing an ideal white balance (a specific 6500K point on the CIE color chart known as D65 or D6500). The lower the Delta E number, the better. Ideally, the Delta E will be identical at every brightness level, but in practice, it always varies. Experts generally agree that levels below 3 or 4 indicate a result that is visibly indistinguishable from perfect color tracking.

The full-on/full-off contrast ratio was determined from a measured peak-white level of 25.12 foot-lamberts and a black level of 0.006 ft-L. As noted in the review, this black level is slightly worse than the similar readings from last year’s TC-P50VT25, although it’s still highly competitive with the best of today’s sets. The best fully backlit, local-dimming LCDs can go deeper into black (they can turn off their LED lighting completely in dark areas), but these sets can have other issues that plasmas generally don’t.

The TC-P55VT30’s calibration shown here is for the THX mode. Before calibration, the result was only fair, with Delta E values ranging from a low of 3.42 to a high of 8.27 from 30 IRE to 100 IRE (13.71 at 20 IRE). After calibration, they were below 3.44 at every level except 30 IRE, where the value rose to 4.11. After calibration, the Delta E values in the Cinema mode (chart not shown) were arguably just as good or even slightly better than in THX, never exceeding 3.9. More significantly, the fixed gamma levels in the Cinema mode averaged 2.16, significantly closer to the desired 2.2 than the THX mode’s 2.04 average. For this reason, the calibrated Cinema mode was used for all 2D viewing.

The 2D CIE chart shown above is for the TC-P55VT30. The other sets’ color gamuts were nearly identical and are shown in their respective lab reports. As discussed in the review, the TC-P55VT30 was calibrated for 3D in the Custom mode. This produced an excellent result (chart not shown) with calibrated Delta E values actually superior to those in 2D (thanks to the 10-step white balance adjustments in the Custom mode). The calibrated 3D Delta E values remained below 2.0 everywhere except 60 IRE, where the reading jumped to 2.39. With the 3D Custom mode’s gamma set to 2.0, the gamma measured an average of 1.61 from 20 IRE to 70 IRE, then dropped to 0.2 (that’s zero point 2) at 90 IRE. Surprisingly, some of the Custom mode’s gamma values, though technically inaccurate in any of the menu’s options, actually worked well with 3D material, with settings of either 2.0 or 2.2 producing the best results (the 3D, 2.6 setting measured an average of 2.1 up to 70 IRE but looked far too dim).—TJN

COMPANY INFO
Panasonic
(800) 221-PANA
ARTICLE CONTENTS
Share | |
COMMENTS
_thx1138_'s picture

nice!

buckchester's picture

How many hours do you have on your VT25? The reason I ask is because it is well documented that the 2009 and 2010 Panasonic plasmas black levels rise over specified periods of time.

CNET has also compared their VT25 to the VT30 and noted that the VT25's blacks on their sample were actually lighter (they measured 0.004 as you did in their initial review, but it has since risen).

Panasonic claims their 2011 plasmas will not rise. Therefore, the VT30's blacks will be darker than the VT25's after the VT25's blacks rise (if what Panasonic claims is true).

This is clearly something that knowledgeable customers want magazines like Home Theater Magazine to report on. I remember reading a blurb in one of your magazines saying that you were going to test your 2010 Panasonic plasmas long-term, but I don't recall ever seeing a follow-up.

SunriseGatefield's picture

Great review Thomas, thanks.

I can't help but question the 4.5 star value score though... This review is substantially the same as for the ST30--save for a difference of .004 Ft-L (if I recall the values correctly) in the black levels (favoring the VT30, of course). I grant that the ST30 is a 5 star value. But is there enough evidence of the VT30's superiority here to make it nearly as good a value?

One other question: shouldn't the VT30's 96Hz refresh rate allow it to handle 24fps material better than the ST30? I didn't see mention of that in the review. Edit: My bad. Tom does mention the 96Hz refresh rate, and says he uses it for 24fps material. There's no mention here that the ST30 an GT30 lack this, but that's clear from the reviews of those models.

kent harrison's picture

Get it calibrate you never change picture mode again its five star television,i should have gotten 65 inch.

X
Enter your Sound & Vision username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Loading
setting var node_statistics_97838