BenQ W7000 3D DLP Projector Page 2

The W7000 provides a few different color temperature presets that you can then fine-tune. I chose the Warm preset to start from and then went into the fine-tuning menu. Although I had the contrast set to show all white values up to digital 235, it was immediately clear that I would have to back off the contrast a bit to get the best RGB balance at higher IREs. The bulb was running out of red at 100 IRE. Ultimately, if you have this projector calibrated, you’ll have to decide how you want to approach it. If you sacrifice a bit of linearity in the upper gray-scale range, you can preserve most of the projector’s brightness potential and still maintain a pretty solid RGB balance. But if you want a nearly perfect gray-scale calibration, you’ll lose some light output. As I mentioned earlier, I achieved about 24 ft-L on my 120-inch screen in low lamp mode with only a minor deviation in RGB balance at 100 IRE. But if I wanted to have a near-perfect RGB balance at 100 IRE, that brightness went down to nearly 14 ft-L, which is still respectable but a pretty significant drop from 24 ft-L.

While the W7000 provides a full color management system, I was surprised that BenQ didn’t include any preset color modes. Instead, it appears that the company wanted to adhere to Rec. 709 as closely as possible right from the get-go. Right out of the box, the W7000 was pretty close to the standard but still had some room for improvement. Unfortunately, the CMS has some issues when it comes to dialing in the primaries. Luminance was easy enough to dial in, but when I tried to adjust either saturation or hue, I’d see a huge shift interaction between these controls. If you adjust saturation, hue goes way out, and vice versa. Through trial and error, however, I got a pretty solid calibration done that had little deviation from the Rec. 709 specification.

The BenQ does have some gamma presets, but it doesn’t include either custom gamma settings or a way to tweak the preset you’ve selected. For the most part, the gamma tracking was pretty linear, but I found it was often slightly different than what the preset intended to deliver. With a 2.2 gamma selected, I would see closer to 2.1. With a 2.4, I would see closer to 2.3. Since this projector’s contrast performance is on the poor side (more on this below), I would suggest using the 2.2 gamma preset. The projector’s black floor just isn’t low enough to do a proper 2.3 to 2.4 gamma with- out black crush.

The W7000 features a few advanced video features, such as frame interpolation and support for an anamorphic lens. I’ve stated many times that I’m not a fan of motion interpolation, and the BenQ didn’t sell me on it any more than any of the other displays that use it. Even in the lowest setting, it provided an unnatural motion look that was more of a distraction than I could bear. I also saw noticeable artifacts around objects during pans and even some frame dropping. If you’re a fan of frame interpolation, the W7000 produced some noticeable issues with it on, even in the lowest setting.

The W7000 supports anamorphic lenses and has built-in presets for Panamorph systems. I don’t have a setup that allows me to test this feature, so I didn’t use it for this review.

Play Time
For this review, I set up the BenQ W7000 in my dedicated home theater room and projected it onto a 120-inch-diagonal Stewart Filmscreen StudioTek 130 (1.3 gain) fixed screen. The player was connected to an Oppo BDP-95 Blu-ray player, Panasonic DMP-BDT220 Blu-ray player, and a DirecTV HD DVR, which were switched via an Anthem Statement D2V surround processor. All connections were made with AudioQuest and BetterCables interconnects. The projector was 14 feet back from the screen with the lens just slightly below the center of the screen.

Let’s just get this out of the way right now. DLP doesn’t cater to the contrast enthusiasts looking for the deepest blacks. In our experience, its contrast performance is typically on the low side, with blacks that lean toward dark gray at best. But DLP designs are often brighter and sharper than projectors based on other technologies, and they deliver impressive contrast in mixed images. I didn’t expect the BenQ to compete with the recent LCOS or SXRD projectors I’ve reviewed for black levels, but I knew it would give them more than a run for their money with brightness, sharpness, and 3D performance.

For 2D viewing, the BenQ’s biggest strengths are its light output and sharp imagery. Unfortunately, its contrast levels are pretty low. In fact, they’re lower than I would have expected, even for a Dark Chip 2 design. Once I got the W7000 calibrated, the best contrast level I could wrangle was about 1,800:1. That’s with the DynamicBlack auto iris turned on. When I turned off the auto iris, I got a measly 600:1, which is lower than any DLP I’ve ever measured. I’m not sure if this is an issue with the light path or iris implementation, but it definitely took its toll on black levels and image depth. Keep in mind, though: This is about the same contrast performance you see from D-Cinema DLP projectors at your local digital theater. So if you don’t have a problem with the contrast performance at your local Cineplex, the W7000’s shouldn’t bother you, either.

What you do get from the W7000 is an extremely bright and vivid image. Colors look won- derful, and the extra brightness lends to an eye-catching image that even impresses with some ambient light left on in the room. I almost wish BenQ would have included a manual iris option so I could dim the image down a bit and maybe get a little more contrast performance on the lower end. If you find the image too bright, you can always use a neutral density filter to dim it. This may also help out with the perception of blacks. BenQ’s W6000 had a manual iris you could access via the projector’s service menu, but I didn’t find any indication that this was the case with the W7000.

Motion resolution was excellent, and the W7000 did great with sports. With so much light to work with, colors had more pop than I was used to, even though they were calibrated to the same spec as my reference projector. Shadow detail was also excellent. While blacks weren’t nearly as deep as I would prefer, the overall level of black was only an issue with the darker material I threw at it. Movies like Aliens Vs Predator and The Dark Knight suffered the most, but most films don’t approach this level of gloom, so the black levels didn’t bother me as much as I thought they would.

Where the W7000 sets itself apart from the rest is 3D. Bar none, this is the best 3D I’ve seen in home theater to date. With lumens to spare, the BenQ delivered a bright, punchy 3D image that was completely devoid of the artifacts I so often see with any other display technology. It didn’t matter what 3D material I put on, I never once saw any distracting artifacts like strobing, ghosting, or flicker. This is the bar that other 3D projectors should strive for.

The BenQ has a specific 3D picture mode that automatically throws it into high lamp mode. You can still adjust its settings, though, and I found that my settings for 2D playback worked quite well. Colors looked natural, and contrast was pretty decent with even the darkest 3D material. I had the chance to use the BenQ for a couple of weeks and went through quite a bit of 3D material. Some recent standouts include the excellent 3D Blu-ray releases of Kung Fu Panda 2, IMAX: Hubble, and Hugo.

Kung Fu Panda 2 provided some of the most beautiful imagery I saw on the W7000. DreamWorks Animation pulled no punches with this one. Colors were dazzling, and the amount of fine detail on display was breathtaking. I was afraid the W7000’s low-contrast performance would hurt image depth, but thankfully that just wasn’t the case. Blacks looked respectable, and the image maintained plenty of depth and dimension. The same can be said for Warner’s release of IMAX: Hubble, which features some incredible imagery taken from the Hubble Telescope.

But the most impressive images were from Paramount’s release of Hugo. Next to Avatar, this is the best 3D I’ve seen from a motion picture. Its use of depth in this film is second to none. Few films even come close to selling me on 3D, but this is a film that I would actually have trouble watching in 2D given how well they executed the 3D effects. The W7000 provided a bright, punchy 3D image that made the best of the interesting color work Scorsese employed and the wonderful infinite sense of depth the film provides. 3D has never looked this good in my home before.

Conclusion
After spending some time with the BenQ W7000, I found myself bummed that we don’t give as much attention to the DLP projection market anymore. The BenQ delivered the best 3D experience I’ve had in my home, while coming up a bit short with 2D material as a consequence of its weak contrast. Obviously, I’ve become a bit spoiled with the blacks my reference JVC projector provides, so ultimately the 2D experience will depend on how picky you are about contrast and black levels. I think a bit more spit and polish could go a long way in this department, as we’ve seen DLP designs—including older ones from BenQ—that delivered far better black levels. But if you’re seeking out a bright projector with superb 3D performance and sharp images, this is one that should be on your short list. I don’t think you’ll find a better 3D image anywhere near this price.

COMPANY INFO
BenQ
(949) 255-9500
ARTICLE CONTENTS
Share | |
COMMENTS
Jarod's picture

I think you guys got the 2D and 3D score flipped around at the performance rating.

Rob Sabin's picture
Actually, it's correct as shown, Jarod. This was an excellent 2D projector for the price but not quite the caliber on black levels and contrast as some of the similarly (or slightly higher) priced offerings from JVC and Sony. But...it really blew Kris away on the quality of the 3D relative to 3D on some of the better 2D projectors. In a word... BRIGHT, which is nearly everything for 3D. DLP is good for that, as well as image sharpness (at least among 1-chip projectors that don't require convergence of separate imaging chips for each color).
Jarod's picture

Ok thanks Mr. Sabin. I must be going crazy cause at first I swear it showed 2D at 5 stars and 3D at 3.5 stars. I think someone corrected it or I could be crazy lol. Looks good now tho. Thanks Rob

hawke47's picture

First, thank you Mr. Deering.

So, do you post, or still have, the calibration settings you used? I was unable to find them, unless I really skimmed through the article too fast.

Also, when you referred to the setup like a local cinema, were you referring to a darkened room that has dark paint/panels? Or, are you just referring to black levels being less inky in theaters?

I have a 30-Day trial on a W7000, but was not sure if I should pay the extra $600 for the Epson 5010. I do want to be able to play video games in the long run, but I have a controlled environment where the neighboring panels are dark, and absorb light rather than reflect it back. The room basically seems dark.

Your thoughts and feedback will be greatly appreciated. Especially since 3.5 out of 5 is a big deal for me on 2D performance.

-Stringfellow

Kris Deering's picture
Hi Everyone and thanks for the feedback. Rob is right, the scores are correct. This is THE 3D projector as far as I'm concerned. I haven't seen 3D this good on anything else. Bright and punch with absolutely no ghosting or artifacts. If you're serious about home theater, this would be a great companion projector to a higher end 2D projector if your budget can swing it. Stringfellow, I don't have my calibration settings on hand, sorry. I'll see if they can be wrangled up. My comparison to a local digital cinema have to do with the picture thrown by the projector. Home theater projectors are typically always judged mainly on contrast performance, which the BenQ falls short on compared to the big hitters like Sony and JVC. But its contrast performance is easily as good as any commercial DLP setup I've seen, so if you like the D-Cinema image at your local cinemaplex, you'll probably love this too.
Kris Deering's picture
Not that you should ever plug in anyone else's calibration settings and think they are just going to work for you the same, here are my calibration settings for the W7000: Mode: User 1 Contrast: 44 Brightness: 54 Sharpness: 5 Color: 50 Tint: 50 Flesh Tone: 0 Advanced: Black Level: 0 IRE Clarity Control: All to 0 Color Temperature: Warm Color Temperature Fine Tuning: Red Gain: 57 Green Gain: 45 Blue Gain: 48 Red Offset: 247 Green Offset: 247 Blue Offset: 245 Gamma Selection: 2.2 Brilliant Color: Off Color Management: Red: Hue 41, Gain 47, Saturation 54 Green: H 65, G 71, S 65 Blue: H 54, G 45, S 49 Cyan: H 28, G 61, S 55 Magenta: H 48, G 44, S 45 Yellow: H 72, G 59, S 60 Film Mode: On 3D Comb Filter: On Dynamic Black: On Other Settings: Aspect Ratio: Real Overscan Adjustment: 0 Frame Interpolation: Off HDMI Settings: PC High Altitude Mode: Off Lamp Setting: Economic Enjoy!
hawke47's picture

I applied all the settings, but noticed that on my machine the Flesh Tones max out at 5, whereas the Sharpness maxes at 2.

You noted Sharpness is set to 5, and Flesh Tones to 0.

1) Should those two numbers be reversed?
2) Also, would applying these settings to Cinema mode be beneficial
3) And, is there any harm in keeping the Lamp Setting in "Normal," mode?

hawke47's picture

For whatever it is worth, like Christmas, we give gifts at the end of Ramadan, which is during the celebration called Eid-al-Fitr. Your most generous responses, irrespective of the truth that calibration is subjective based on the environment it is being done in and your initial reply about the D-Cinema and its relationship to DLP, were by far the coolest gift, yet.

Thank you! :)

-Stringfellow

PS. I have tried Art Feierman's settings (from Projector Reviews), and it looked pretty amazing. Initially, he had some issues with certain colors (I think cyan???), but they were mostly resolved in the updated model he received (new firmware). I will compare the two settings this week and let y'all know what I thought. Also, I am saving up to potentially get it professionally calibrated, but I have to wait a little while for that.

dougri's picture

Were the reviewers able to compare the W7000 to the previously reviewed (and since revised-review) Sharp XV-Z30000? Specifically for 3D, how does the brightness compare with decent color? How does the brightness compare in brightest mode for 3D? The W7000 is certainly bright (especially calibrated in 2D), but loses a bit of oomph in 3D... is it significantly brighter in 3D (calibrated and brightest)than the XV-Z30000, which has better 2D performance?

Ricky Jackson's picture

The price seems little high, but when we start using it we understand the price is not high. It is up to our expectation and provides good performance. We bought this series when it is released and it is really great.
Omni Tech Support

jacob john's picture

I am looking at setting up my Home theatre and am considering the BenQ W7000. The room size is 17.5 ft x 14.5 ft. I plan to ceiling mount the projector at the back of the room and so approx throw distance would be around 15.5 ft. This is a dedicated media room but has windows and hence the ambient light - I possibly would use dark curtains. I was planning to go with a 140" diagonal screen. I want to know if a 140" screen will be good for both 2D and 3D movies viewing or will I lose some picture quality with that big a screen. Also given my room size will I be able to get a 140" image.

jacob john's picture

Anyone has suggestions on this? Thanks.

khonggianso's picture

please! post your cabliration setting for BenQ W1070
http://hddc.vn/Hinh-anh/May-Chieu/benq/benq-w7000+

X
Enter your Sound & Vision username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Loading
setting var node_statistics_99114