Onkyo TX-RZ900 A/V Receiver Review

PRICE $1,599

Equipped with Dolby Atmos, primed for DTS:X
Abundant clean, dynamic power
AirPlay, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi all on board
Versatile, usable, hi-res-ready streaming options
Only two height channels, whether powered or line
Failed to stream DSD recordings

Plenty of performance and features, and solid human factors, with an emphasis on core audio quality, at fair “flagship” pricing.

Producing a test report on a “flagship” A/V receiver is always a bit of a high-wire act. On one hand, the receiver represents the top of the line: Maximum power, maximum features, and maximum performance are all expected—and generally delivered. On the other hand, cruiser-class designs rarely offer much of real importance that a model two or three jumps down any given maker’s line doesn’t also do quite competently—and for roughly half the price, which means it’s the model that most folks eventually buy. This leaves the hapless reviewer with the unenviable choice of either damning with faint praise or condemning excellence for its expense.

That said, Onkyo’s latest isn’t literally top-of-the-line; a couple of preexisting, fully 11.2/9.2-channel models carrying higher MSRPs remain on the company’s Website. Nonetheless, I will lead with this advice: If a flagship (or flagship-consort) model incorporates a feature or real utility you need—in the TX-RZ900’s case, this might be Zone 2 HDMI-out—go for it in good conscience. Otherwise, “just because” is probably as good a rationale as any; it’s always nice to know you bought the best.

The Setup
Although it’s heavy enough at 40 pounds—much of that due to a special toroidal power transformer touted as a boon to sound quality—the newest Onkyo is half the weight of some A/V flagships of yore, so I managed to unbox it and hoist it atop my rack without sustaining permanent injury. The receiver’s black-monolith looks are squarely handsome, but its tiny gold-on-black panel graphics proved entirely illegible without strong light and reading glasses. And while the central, drop-down door that conceals secondary controls moved smoothly and closed crisply enough, its closed-position stops—a pair of foam blocks glued to the subpanel—seemed rather inelegant when it was open.

Three important features, the first two also present on newer Onkyo models well down the lineup, highlight the TX-RZ900. First, it’s DTS:X-ready, meaning that a future firmware update is promised to deliver DTS’s flavor of object-oriented, channel-scalable surround sound—alongside Dolby’s flavor, Atmos, which is also included here. Second, the receiver provides HDCP 2.2-capable HDMI connectivity, which means that it will, or at least should, accept forthcoming 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray players. Third, the TX-RZ900 is THX Select2 Plus certified. (THX categories are getting as hard to keep straight as canned-olive grades.) Onkyo also underscores that the HDMI ports support passthrough of high dynamic range (HDR) video, though unlike some other models in Onkyo’s line, the TX-RZ900 performs no video processing. It is strictly a what-comes-in-is-what-goes-out device, the sole exception being incoming SD video, which the Onkyo cross-converts to HDMI but does not scale.

Thus, the only video “performance” note I made regarded HDMI source-to-source switching, which seemed noticeably faster than what I’ve experienced from many other Onkyo AVRs—a welcome upgrade. Otherwise, the TX-RZ900’s only real video aspect was its onscreen displays, which were quick, crisp, and readable, though entirely text-based despite a “Features” bullet-point of “Graphical Overlaid OSD.” Interestingly, an Onkyo receiver at half the price I reported upon nearly two years ago included very competent Marvel Qdeo video processing.

The little-mourned decline of S-video and composite-video (0/4 jacks, total) makes for a spacious rear panel; hookup was a snap. While billed without qualification as Dolby Atmos/DTS:X-ready, the TX-RZ900 incorporates only seven amplifier channels, so an Atmos/DTS:X setup with more than two “height” speakers—which I think very well worth the trouble—is not an option. Worse, Onkyo does not even permit you to route the two shortchanged channels to an external amplifier: With the TX-RZ900, two height channels is the max, period. Onkyo is by no means alone among the AVR corps in producing receivers in this architecture, but in all cases, and certainly at this price, I deplore the lack of expandability. (Onkyo’s $1,699, nine-channel-power TX-NR1030 does permit flexible, 11.2-channel pre-out routing, so we know it’s possible.) Neither the TX-RZ900’s printed Basic Manual (supplied) nor the online Advanced Manual Web-linked on its cover, make all of this particularly explicit. (Ironically, the Dolby Atmos graphic on the TX-RZ900’s page on Onkyo’s own Website displays nine loudspeakers.)


Slardybardfast's picture

I currently own an Onkyo NX-818 that I absolutely love in large degree for its implementation of Audyssey MultiEQ XT. With the elimination of Audyssey EQ from their receivers, Onkyo has lost me as a future customer. Denon is in my future.

aravaioli's picture

Same here. I also consider Audyssey superior to any other calibration system I tried (which includes also Anthem), so cost-cutting there for me simply means giving up to the most discerning customers and betting on those who only buy features (which often will never use, while well-calibrated speakers are a constant and permanent enjoyment).
Besides that, Onkyo also developed a very poor reputation in terms of reliability, which I have experienced myself with the TX-NR818 dying and becoming un-reparable for the well-known faulty HDMI board problem. They lost a customer and who knows how many others? I do not have sales figures but I doubt Onkyo is keeping up with Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Pioneer. Maybe they are now as the same level of Harman Kardon, another company victim of the same choices which downgraded it as budget hi-fi.

Truthsayer's picture

I currently own 7 models of onkyo a/v recievers dating back to 1987.

And it's obvious the reviewer or the previous post's have not auditioned the RZ-900.

The new accu eq calibration, puts audyssey to shame. And the sound quality, truly is top notch of anything on the present market.
People please quit worring about not having audyssey, that would be a downgrade to what this unit incorporates now.

I am lucky enough to audition many different units, including, Anthem audio, Marantz, Denon, Yamaha etc. For audiophile grade quality, ease of set up, 2nd gen accu the onkyo puts them to shame.

hk2000's picture

readers should check this review out: http://hometheaterreview.com/onkyo-tx-rz900-72-channel-av-receiver-revie.... The reviewer is very impressed with the new AccuEQ

Slardybardfast's picture

Aravaioli and Truthsayer, I suggest that you read the Hometheaterreview review a little more carefully and with less optimism. In particular, do you believe the following quotes mean that the TX-RZ900's AccuEQ system is the equal of Audyssey MultiEQ XT:

"Although it might not be as refined, and although it doesn't offering (sic) nearly the number of setup parameters (much less the number of measuring positions), I'd put the new AccuEQ in the same category as superior room correction systems like Anthem Room Correction and Dirac, at least in terms of the effect it has on standing waves. It may not deliver results as perfect as those aforementioned systems, but it gets you 80 percent of the way there with a fifth of the effort."

"Other than that, my only constructive criticism would be that Onkyo needs to work on AccuEQ a little more to perfect its detection of proper crossover settings. Perhaps it could default to 80 Hz and run a quick check to see if the speakers can handle such a crossover setting, then go from there"?

Note that the comparison mentioned in the above quotes is limited to Room Correction only and does not include frequency correction over the entire frequency range. The review simply and mysterious says:

"Here's the thing, though: in my room, that's just about all that AccuEQ does to the audio, and rightly so. Whereas last year's AccuEQ tended to darken vocals and the overall timbre of my sound system (the centers and surrounds, at least), AccuEQ 2015 leaves everything from the midrange on up effectively untouched. As it should. There's none of the deadening that comes with Audyssey."

I dare you to find a review of Audyssey MultEQ XT that describes it as darkening. In the meantime, the review offers faint praise of version 2 of AccuEQ 2015 by saying that it eliminates SOME of the previous versions problems.

And where are the comments on AccuEQ's subwoofer equalization? They don’t exist.

Please read the Hometheaterreview review once again. This time more objectively. AccuEQ is not the equal of Audyssey MultiEQ XT by a long shot.

My original comment still applies: “I currently own an Onkyo NX-818 that I absolutely love in large degree for its implementation of Audyssey MultiEQ XT. With the elimination of Audyssey EQ from their receivers, Onkyo has lost me as a future customer. Denon is in my future.

One correction to my original post: My Onkyo NX-818 has Audyssey MultEQ XT32 implemented, albeit for one subwoofer only. XT32 has hundreds of control points in the subwoofer range alone.


Mrsnikoph78's picture

I've never owned a receiver with Audessey, so I don't know if I would like it or not.

But I picked up an RZ800 at an awesome price, and decided to check out ACCU EQ for myself. Then I measured the results with Room EQ just to see if I could get into the Ballpark of what it is doing.

What I can note is that, despite having 5 identical tower speakers playing, it selected crossovers relatively correctly once, and then screwed them up bad twice. It has nailed distance to within a few inches every time. Levels are also spot on - only + or - 1 dB. I EQ down the subwoofers as a matter of preference.

It EQ's the subwoofers as well. I have two different ones, and it saw and corrected some room modes at about 100 hz and a big one at 40 hz. It didn't make measured response "ruler flat", but it tightened up and improved overall bass response considerably. I've been experimenting with leaving it either "on for all channels" or "Off for Mains, On for rest". I seem to prefer it off for the mains when using my other center channel, on for all channels when running 3 towers across the front.

When on, ACCU EQ appears to shelf down the mid/treble relative to the bass. It doesn't EQ frequencies above, say, 120-300 hz? But it seems to be doing something to the mid/treble levels, as the measurements make plain.

In short, I'd like to have an actual image of the measured result and target response, but you don't get one. But I can say that its a great sound that largely deals only with bass, as it should. In addition, there is still a multi-band EQ that can be used to tweak each connected speaker independently, to the User's preference.

boxerdog's picture

I contacted my Authorized Onkyo Dealer (repair service) to order a TX-RZ900 and was told Onkyo is allready no longer producing this unit! Within a month I was told new models are being released.

Truthsayer's picture

Boxerdog, you need a new dealer. I contacted Onkyo directly, and whom ever told you that, is wrong.

You can still order directly from Onkyo or a dealer.

boxerdog's picture

I correct myself I was told they are no longer being produced and that new models will replace. Units are still available. Hoping new units will have more channels for 5.2.4 or higher.

poisson praveen's picture
poisson praveen's picture
poisson praveen's picture
poisson praveen's picture
poisson praveen's picture
poisson praveen's picture

telangana ssc results 2016 results are going to be released on this 10th mnay 2016 TS SSC Results 2016 school wise ,

TS SSC Results 2016 with marks ,

TS SSC Results 2016 name wise with marks ,

poisson praveen's picture

recent results and all many more results are going to b ereleased on this week check it out
TS SSC Results name wise ,

TS SSC Results school wise ,

sindhu's picture

Ya that's great to have blog like this it may clear the many thought from this

Pega Training |
AWS Training |
Informatica MDM Training |
PlSQL Training |
Qlikview Training |
Teradata Training

nancy's picture

You have done really great job. I have read your blog, its really very informative and unique content. Thanks for sharing informative post to our vision. Mainframe Training | J2EE Training | Core Java Training | Oracle DBA Training

snapchat's picture
nancy's picture

Thanks for sharing such an informative post. Suppose if anyone interested to learn evergreen technologies through online then landed at Gangboard. India’s leading training institute offering real time courses with placement assistance. Thanks. Core Java Training | Dot Net Training | SQL Server DBA Training

melbahenry's picture

This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work. Node.js Training | WebSphere Training | LoadRunner Training | Pentaho Training | Python Training | Selenium Training

acchu's picture
Sandy1507's picture
rajkumarjonnala's picture
fulltelugu's picture
aliisajoseph's picture

Google Launches free android application preparing for engineers. It is a 11 session course with numerous modules including composing application for different screens to adapting your application. R Programming Training | SAS Training | Android Online Training | Weblogic Online Training | MongoDB Online Training | MongoDB Admin Online Training | SQL Online Training