LATEST ADDITIONS

Filed under
Posted: Jan 25, 2004 0 comments

<I>Anthony Edwards, George Clooney, Sherry Stringfield, Noah Wyle, Julianna Margulies, Eriq La Salle. Aspect ratio: 1.78:1 (anamorphic). Dolby Digital 2.0 (French subtitles). Four discs. 999 minutes. 1993. Warner Bros. Home Video 24629. NR. $59.98.</I>

Filed under
Joel Brinkley Posted: Jan 25, 2004 0 comments

Survey a panel of true video experts and ask them which of the many competing technologies, old and new, is capable of producing the very best picture, and the majority&mdash;perhaps even all of them&mdash;will still answer: "A top-of-the-line, data-grade CRT projector with 9-inch tubes." If asked who makes the best such CRT projector, many of those experts will cite Runco and its DTV-1200 model, though some also will praise Sony's VPH-G90U, the projector I own. The differences between two top-of-the-line 9-inch CRT projectors are modest at best.

Filed under
HT Staff Posted: Jan 20, 2004 Published: Jan 21, 2004 0 comments
A legendary name among high-end video companies, Faroudja isn't content to sit on its many laurels. The Silicon Valley company demonstrated several new products at this year's Consumer Electronics Show. Foremost among them is the recently introduced DVP4000 digital video processor.
Filed under
HT Staff Posted: Jan 20, 2004 Published: Jan 21, 2004 0 comments
Vidikron's PlasmaView family has a new sibling. Officially introduced at the recent Consumer Electronics Show, the VP-42HD is a high-resolution 16:9 plasma display monitor ("PDP"), boasting a native resolution of 1024x768. The VP-42HD is "a high-resolution alternative to the enhanced resolution VP-42," states a company announcement.
Filed under
Daniel Kumin Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments

Photos by Tony Cordoza Samsung's SIR-S4120R neatly combines two of the coolest products in today's pantheon of A/V wonders - digital satellite TV receivers and TiVo video hard-disk recorders (HDRs) - in one trim component that looks more or less like an ordinary DirecTV receiver.

David Ranada Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments

Photos by Tony Cordoza Modern consumer electronics is so modular in design and construction that you could almost invent a new component category using the old Chinese-restaurant formula: choose one technology from column A and another from column B.

Filed under
Antonoff Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments
Icon illustrations by Bill Villarreal
DVD
Nothing has had a bigger impact on home thea
Filed under
Barry Willis Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments

St. Louis&ndash;based <A HREF="http://www.charter.com">Charter Communications, Inc</A>. has become the first cable provider in the US to rollout an all-digital network, according to a January 16 announcement. The new service was implemented without the use of analog set-top boxes, using an existing HFC (hybrid fiber-coaxial) network. The service, in Charter's Long Beach, CA system, combines digital programming with basic analog programming. The bandwidth-intensive service is made possible by use of a digital compression system consisting of "<A HREF="http://www.harmonicinc.com">Harmonic</A> DiviCom MV 50 variable bit-rate encoders and third-generation DiviTrackXE closed loop statistical multiplexing system," according to the announcement. For Charter subscribers, the new digital service can be activated "remotely and instantly" without the need for in-person service calls, said Charter vice president of engineering Wayne Davis.

Filed under
Barry Willis Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments

As any SGHT reader knows, home theater is one of the electronic industry's growth areas. Related niches&mdash;DVD, HDTV, and multichannel audio&mdash;are equally hot and getting hotter. Cutting-edge manufacturers are pushing into the market like never before, with fascinating innovations.

Filed under
Posted: Jan 19, 2004 0 comments

Robert Deutsch and Thomas J. Norton provide us with follow-ups on a pair of classic HT products with <A HREF="/videoprojectors/1103dlp">Take Two: Marantz VP-12S2 and SharpVision XV-Z10000U DLP projectors</A>. Two different reviewers and two different systems. Will they get the same results as noted in the original reviews?

Pages